Indian Evidence Act Set 8 MCQs

Q1 | An accomplice is a person

who participates in the commission of the crime for which the accused has been charged

who is a prefended confederate

who is an informer

all the above both (a) 8: (b).

Q2 | Testimony of an accomplice before it is accepted &: acted upon

must be corroborated from the testimony of another accomplice

must be corroborated from an independent source

need not be corroborated at all

either (a) or (c).

Q3 | Question as to admissibility of evidence

should be decided as they arise

should be reserved until judgment

may be decided as they arise or may be reserved until judgment

either (b) or (c).

Q4 | Examination in chief of a witness

shall be by the party calling the witness

shall be by the adverse party

both (a) & (b)

either (a) -or (b).

Q5 | Re-examination of a witness

shall be by the party calling the witness

shall be by the adverse party

both (a) & (b)

either (a) or (b).

Q6 | Re-examinati0n of a witness can be done

after examination in chief but before cross-examination

after examination chief and after cross-examination

either (a) or (b)

neither (a) nor (b).

Q7 | During re-examination of a witness

a new matter can be introduced as a matter of right generally

a new matter can be introduced only with the permission of the court

no new matter can be introduced at all

either (a) or (c).

Q8 | A co-defendant in a case

cannot be cross-examined by another co- defendant under any circumstance

can be cross-examined by another co-defendant if their interests are identical

can be cross-examined by another co-defendant when their interests adverse to each other

can be cross-examined by another co-defendant as a matter of right.

Q9 | It Cross-examination of a witness 229. Leading questions can be asked during

examination in chief

cross-examination

re-examination

all the above.

Q10 | Court can permit leading questions during examination in chief or re-examination

if they refer to the matters which are introductory

if they refer to the matters which are undisputed

if they refer to the matter which are sufficiently proved

if they refer to either (a) or (b) or (c).

Q11 | A leading question has been defined as a question suggesting the answer which theperson putting it wishes or expects to receive, under

section 140 of evidence act

section 141 of evidence act

section 142 of evidence act

section 143 of evidence act.

Q12 | Under section 145 of Evidence Act, a witness may be cross-examined as to previousstatement in writing

without proving the same and without showing the same to the witness

only after proving the same, may be without showing the same to the witness

without proving the same but only after showing the same to the witness

only after proving the same & showing the same to the witness.

Q13 | Under section 145 of Evidence Act, a witness may be contradicted as to previousstatement in writing

without proving the same and without showing the same to the witness

without proving the same but only after showing the same to the witness

after proving the same may be before showing the same to the witness

after proving the same & showing the same to the witness.

Q14 | Objections as to the admissibility of a document in evidence

can be made at any state during the trial

can be made at the first opportunity when the document is tendered in evidence

can be raised for the first time in appeal

all the above.

Q15 | A party/person who calls the witness can be permitted to cross-examine the witnessso called by him, as provided

under section 152 of evidence act

under section 153 of evidence act

under section 154 of evidence act

under section 155 of evidence act.

Q16 | Section 162 of Cr PC

controls section 157 of evidence act

controls section 156 of evidence act

both (a) & (b)

neither (a) nor (b).

Q17 | Court questions can be put by virtue of

section 164 of evidence act

section 165 of evidence act

section 166 of evidence act

section 167 of evidence act.

Q18 | Court question under section 165 of Evidence Act can be put to

any witness

any party

both (a) & (b)

neither (a) nor (b).

Q19 | To an answer to a court question, the adverse party

has a right to cross-examination as a matter of right

has a right to cross-examine only with the permission of the court

has no right to cross-examine the witness

either (a) or (c).

Q20 | The right to cross-examine on an answer to court question is available

to the adverse party only

to the party calling the witness only

to either of the parties if the answer is adverse to either of the parties

only (a) and not (b).

Q21 | Under section 41 of Evidence Act the presumption is with respect to

judgments in rem when they are inter- parts

judgment in rem whether such judgments are inter-partes or not

judgments in personam

all the above.

Q22 | The presumption under section 41 of Evidence Act is a

presumption of fact

rebuttable presumption of law

irrebuttable presumption of law .

presumption of fact & law.

Q23 | Delhi High Court issued guidelines for the protection of witness in

neelam katara case (2003)

naina sahni case (2007)

llphaar cinema case (2005)

parliament attack case (2006).

Q24 | Where there are three different dying declarations, Higher Court is

not to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court

to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court

to go through the circumstantial evidence to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court

to rely upon the versions of witnesses to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court.

Q25 | Zahira Sheikh was prime witness in

best bakery case (2004)

best bakery retrial case (2006) \

sukh ram disproportionate assets case (2005)

gujjar killings case (2003).