Indian Evidence Act Set 8
On This Page
This set of Indian Evidence Act Multiple Choice Questions & Answers (MCQs) focuses on Indian Evidence Act Set 8
Q1 | An accomplice is a person
- who participates in the commission of the crime for which the accused has been charged
- who is a prefended confederate
- who is an informer
- all the above both (a) 8: (b).
Q2 | Testimony of an accomplice before it is accepted &: acted upon
- must be corroborated from the testimony of another accomplice
- must be corroborated from an independent source
- need not be corroborated at all
- either (a) or (c).
Q3 | Question as to admissibility of evidence
- should be decided as they arise
- should be reserved until judgment
- may be decided as they arise or may be reserved until judgment
- either (b) or (c).
Q4 | Examination in chief of a witness
- shall be by the party calling the witness
- shall be by the adverse party
- both (a) & (b)
- either (a) -or (b).
Q5 | Re-examination of a witness
- shall be by the party calling the witness
- shall be by the adverse party
- both (a) & (b)
- either (a) or (b).
Q6 | Re-examinati0n of a witness can be done
- after examination in chief but before cross-examination
- after examination chief and after cross-examination
- either (a) or (b)
- neither (a) nor (b).
Q7 | During re-examination of a witness
- a new matter can be introduced as a matter of right generally
- a new matter can be introduced only with the permission of the court
- no new matter can be introduced at all
- either (a) or (c).
Q8 | A co-defendant in a case
- cannot be cross-examined by another co- defendant under any circumstance
- can be cross-examined by another co-defendant if their interests are identical
- can be cross-examined by another co-defendant when their interests adverse to each other
- can be cross-examined by another co-defendant as a matter of right.
Q9 | It Cross-examination of a witness 229. Leading questions can be asked during
- examination in chief
- cross-examination
- re-examination
- all the above.
Q10 | Court can permit leading questions during examination in chief or re-examination
- if they refer to the matters which are introductory
- if they refer to the matters which are undisputed
- if they refer to the matter which are sufficiently proved
- if they refer to either (a) or (b) or (c).
Q11 | A leading question has been defined as a question suggesting the answer which theperson putting it wishes or expects to receive, under
- section 140 of evidence act
- section 141 of evidence act
- section 142 of evidence act
- section 143 of evidence act.
Q12 | Under section 145 of Evidence Act, a witness may be cross-examined as to previousstatement in writing
- without proving the same and without showing the same to the witness
- only after proving the same, may be without showing the same to the witness
- without proving the same but only after showing the same to the witness
- only after proving the same & showing the same to the witness.
Q13 | Under section 145 of Evidence Act, a witness may be contradicted as to previousstatement in writing
- without proving the same and without showing the same to the witness
- without proving the same but only after showing the same to the witness
- after proving the same may be before showing the same to the witness
- after proving the same & showing the same to the witness.
Q14 | Objections as to the admissibility of a document in evidence
- can be made at any state during the trial
- can be made at the first opportunity when the document is tendered in evidence
- can be raised for the first time in appeal
- all the above.
Q15 | A party/person who calls the witness can be permitted to cross-examine the witnessso called by him, as provided
- under section 152 of evidence act
- under section 153 of evidence act
- under section 154 of evidence act
- under section 155 of evidence act.
Q16 | Section 162 of Cr PC
- controls section 157 of evidence act
- controls section 156 of evidence act
- both (a) & (b)
- neither (a) nor (b).
Q17 | Court questions can be put by virtue of
- section 164 of evidence act
- section 165 of evidence act
- section 166 of evidence act
- section 167 of evidence act.
Q18 | Court question under section 165 of Evidence Act can be put to
- any witness
- any party
- both (a) & (b)
- neither (a) nor (b).
Q19 | To an answer to a court question, the adverse party
- has a right to cross-examination as a matter of right
- has a right to cross-examine only with the permission of the court
- has no right to cross-examine the witness
- either (a) or (c).
Q20 | The right to cross-examine on an answer to court question is available
- to the adverse party only
- to the party calling the witness only
- to either of the parties if the answer is adverse to either of the parties
- only (a) and not (b).
Q21 | Under section 41 of Evidence Act the presumption is with respect to
- judgments in rem when they are inter- parts
- judgment in rem whether such judgments are inter-partes or not
- judgments in personam
- all the above.
Q22 | The presumption under section 41 of Evidence Act is a
- presumption of fact
- rebuttable presumption of law
- irrebuttable presumption of law .
- presumption of fact & law.
Q23 | Delhi High Court issued guidelines for the protection of witness in
- neelam katara case (2003)
- naina sahni case (2007)
- llphaar cinema case (2005)
- parliament attack case (2006).
Q24 | Where there are three different dying declarations, Higher Court is
- not to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court
- to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court
- to go through the circumstantial evidence to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court
- to rely upon the versions of witnesses to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court.
Q25 | Zahira Sheikh was prime witness in
- best bakery case (2004)
- best bakery retrial case (2006) \
- sukh ram disproportionate assets case (2005)
- gujjar killings case (2003).