Business Laws and Special Contracts Set 3

On This Page

This set of Business Regulations Multiple Choice Questions & Answers (MCQs) focuses on Business Laws and Special Contracts Set 3

Q1 | The promises forming consideration for each other are called
  • reciprocal promises
  • mutual promises
  • independent promises
  • none of the above
Q2 | Ex turpi causa non oritur action means?
  • from an illegal cause, no action arises
  • from an illegal cause action may arises
  • from an legal cause action may arises
  • from an legal cause action may not arises
Q3 | Consideration and object of an agreement is unlawful if it
  • is fraudulent
  • is possible
  • is impossible
  • all of the above
Q4 | The stifling agreement is
  • wagering
  • contingent
  • voidable
  • void
Q5 | Which of the following agreements are valid?
  • uncertain agreements
  • wagering agreements
  • agreements to do impossible events
  • none of the above
Q6 | In which of the following agreements, restraint of trade is valid?
  • agreement with buyer of goodwill
  • trade combinations not opposed to public policy
  • partnership agreements
  • all of the above
Q7 | An uncertain agreement is
  • voidable
  • void
  • valid
  • illegal
Q8 | An illegal agreement is
  • not enforceable by law
  • prohibited under law
  • either (a) & (b)
  • both (a) & (b)
Q9 | Which of the following is not a feature of a wagering agreement?
  • chances of gain or loss
  • uncertainty of future event
  • neither party have control over future event
  • neither parties should have an interest in the event
Q10 | An athletic competitions are valid because they are
  • games of skill
  • just games
  • game of luck
  • all of the above
Q11 | Share market transactions with a clear intention only to settle the price difference are
  • wagering agreements
  • not wagering agreements
  • contingent contracts
  • voidable agreements
Q12 | Which of these are not opposed to public policy?
  • trading with enemy
  • stifling prosecution
  • compromise of compoundable offences
  • agreement to commit a crime
Q13 | Where a person agrees to maintain a suit, in which he has no interest, the proceeding isknown as
  • champerty
  • maintenance
  • stifling with prosecution
  • interference with course of justice
Q14 | An agreement whereby one party assists another in recovering money or property and in turnshare in the proceeds of the action is called
  • champerty
  • maintenance
  • stifling with prosecution
  • trafficking the public office
Q15 | Which of the following is a contingent contract?
  • contract of insurance
  • contract for doing impossible acts
  • marriage contract
  • wagering agreements
Q16 | Consent means parties agreeing on
  • the terms of contract
  • some terms of contract
  • the same thing in the same sense
  • any matter of contract
Q17 | _________ means forcibly compelling a person to enter into a contract
  • intimidation
  • fraud
  • mistake
  • coercion
Q18 | Duress under English contract law is similar to
  • undue influence
  • coercion
  • fraud
  • misrepresentation
Q19 | Ubberima fidei means
  • bad faith
  • utmost good faith
  • good faith
  • no faith at all
Q20 | When one of the parties is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, itis called
  • unilateral mistake
  • bilateral mistake
  • partial mistake
  • incomplete mistake
Q21 | The maxim ‘Ignoranlia juris non excusa’ stands for
  • law will not punish ignorant people
  • law will punish illiterate people
  • ignorant people can excuse law
  • ignorance of law of land is no excuse
Q22 | The case of ‘no consent’, i.e., when there is no consent at all, is described by Salmond as
  • error in causa
  • error in consensus
  • consensus ad idem
  • offer and acceptance
Q23 | Capacity to contract means
  • the parties are financially sound to make contracts
  • the parties are physically able to enter into contracts
  • the parties are legally competent to enter into contracts
  • all of the above
Q24 | Competence to contract means
  • age of the parties
  • soundness of the mind of the parties
  • both (a) & (b)
  • intelligence of the parties
Q25 | A minor’s agreement is void. This was held in the case of
  • mohiri bibee vs. dharmadas ghosh
  • salma begam vs. jan mohamed khan
  • balfour vs. balfour
  • chinnaiya vs. ramaiya