Deontology and Kantian Ethics

Deontology

A normative theory that basis its moral focus on duty,obligations and rules

deon means

duty

moral actions adhere to _______
rather than __________

rules (duty) , consequences

Opposed to

Consequentialism and Pragmatism

Main avenues of Deontology:

Moral Absolutes
Divine Command Theory
Kantian Ethics

why is deontology opposed to consequentialism

moral actions are based on results or consequences.

why is deontology opposed to pragmatism

theory and practice; intelligent practice

Moral Absolutism

Some actions are absolutely right or absolutely wrong; Intentions and
consequences do not matter; just obedience to rules

The only right thing is ________ and who said it

The Will" (Kantian) / Kant, W.D. Ross

Divine Command Theory:

- An action is right if God has stated or declared that it is right.
- Follow God's orders for they are right; moral
- Descartes, Calvinists...
- Whether the consequences are positive or not, does not matter.

Pietism

shares an emphasis on personal behavior with the Puritan movement

why did kant believe in deontology

- He believed people must act from a sense of 'Duty.'
- The consequences don't make an act wrong, but the intentions of the person

Kant's Influences: Rationalism

Reason is justification for understanding the world around us.
Knowledge is independent of experience.
We understand innately, the existence of God, Immortality of our soul, freedom
of the will, causality etc...

name 3 rationalist

Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz

Kant's Influences: Empiricism

Knowledge comes from sensory experience; We are not born with
innate ideas, we are born with a tabula rasa, or clean slate; and gather up information as we experience it

name 2 empiricist

John Locke, David Hume

Rationalism vs Empiricism when it comes to morality

-Rationalism Empiricism
Our knowledge of Moral Principles
was implanted in us by God, and
discoverable by reason as it deduces
general principles about human
nature.
-Empiricism
Morality is founded entirely on the
contingencies of human nature and
based o

Where does Kant stand when it comes to morality from rationalism vs empiricism argument

We cannot have Morality be contingent! It is necessary

Intuitionism

The theory that humans have a natural faculty
that gives us an intuitive awareness of morality

2 types of intuitionism

Act-Intuitionism
Rule-Intuitionism

Act-Intuitionism:

Each act is a unique situation. We consult our conscious or our
"intuitions" to decide what is right or what is wrong; even if different from rules.
EX: "Let your conscious be your guide...

Rule-intuitionism

Rule-Intuitionism: We decide what is right or wrong in each situation by consulting moral rules that receive through intuition. We adhere to these rules at all times; we understand these rules through reason and intuition.
EX: "Don't kill innocent people

Kant had what kind of upbringing

Pietism

Kant's highest good

Good in itself (intrinsic)
Good without qualifications (addition of that thing never makes a situation
ethically worse)

What is not Intrinsically Good

Intelligence, perseverance, pleasure

The Good Will:

The consequence of an act, says nothing about the person's will.
- Good consequences can come from bad people...
- Must act out of respect for moral law... your duty to moral law.
- Respect: "The concept of a worth which thwarts my self-love

Categorical Imperative

? Act only according to that maxim by which you can also will that it becomes
a universal law.
? Act in such a way that you always treat humans never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end.

Not Free Agent:

Not Free Agent: forced to act a certain way;

Acts from Inclination or Duty

acts from free agent

Duty: Obligations

Acts you "ought" to do

Inclination:

Preference or "taste" of which free action to commit; no demand

Kants stand on terms of action

A person is acting freely when he/she suppresses inclinations and
feelings does what they are obligated to do.

Nature of Duty:

act not of inclination but because agent knows they must

Accordance w/Duty" vs. "From Duty

Accordance with Duty does not guarantee its morality; its not
- Only acts 'from duty' are moral.
Ex. You feed your children not for fear of CPS, but you feed them because you
have an obligation to them being your children.
Ex. A Professor assigns reading

The Will (Part II)

The essence of morality is to be found in the motive from which an act is
done; a person is moral when he/she act from a sense of duty
- A good person is a person of "good will," "buena voluntad"
- "benevolent volition

Q. Is it Prudent or is it Right?

Prudential Action: acting from prudence; from reason (not moral unless...)
Moral Action: acting from your bond to morality
A Moral action = one done from a respect for duty
A Moral person = acts from duty, not from inclination or accord w/ duty.

divine command theory

an action is right if god has stated/declared it is right