Chapter 5- Corporate Ethical Governance & Accountability:

Accountability to Shareholders or Stakeholders?

Legally
accountable to Shareholders;
Strategically
accountable to Stakeholders

Threats to Good Governance & Accountability:

1) Misunderstanding Objectives & Fiduciary Duty
2) Failure to Identify & Manage Ethics Risks
3) Conflict of Interest

Causes of Judgment Bias- Conflicts of Interest:

1) Conflicting interests/loyalties that may sway judgment
2) Self-Interest
3) Fraud
4) Misunderstanding
5) Slippery Slope

Self-Interest Examples:

Bribes/kickbacks, gifts, special advantages, special treatment, dealing with relatives

Fraud Examples:

Misappropriation of funds, cheating on expense account, falsifying documents, stealing cash, falsifying results to obtain bonuses

Misunderstanding:

Confused signals/incentives, boss/everybody's doing it, cultural differences

Slippery Slope:

Small favor leads to ever-larger demands

Importance Aspects of an Ethical Culture:

1) Ethical leadership
2) Reward systems incorporate ethical considerations
3) Perceived fairness
4) Open discussions of ethics
5) Emphasizes employee accountability

Usual Dimensions of Ethical Programs:

1) Formal ethics code
2) Ethics committees
3) Ethics communication system
4) Ethics officers
5) Ethics training programs
6) Disciplinary processes

How Ethics Programs Effect Perceptions:

Existence of ethics program improves perceptions & behaviors on all dimensions

Most significant improvement when comparing company w/ ethics program to one w/o:

Tone at the top is more clearly understood

How to Avoid Implementation Problems w/ Code:

1) Top leadership guidance
2) General Principles
3) Guidance for making tradeoffs
4) Employees empowered to make ethical decisions
5) All employees receive Code & training
6) Reinforcement of Code compliance

Ethical Leadership:

Need the right tone at the top so that employees follow the ethical values (instead of ST profit maximization)
-Have to be both a moral leader AND moral person

Director & Officer Liability:

Managers/directors can be found personally liable for unethical behavior of the anyone in the organization

SOX Mitigation:

If there's an ethical failure, prosecution/penalty can be mitigated if company demonstrates did everything in their power to send employees message about ethics/have strong ethics program; shows person's a rogue factor

When Accounting Profession lost Credibility:

Also lost autonomy and self-regulation
-Now lawyers make the rules instead of accountants

20-60-20 Rule

20% would never commit fraud; 60% would commit if low chance of being caught; 20% will always commit

Chinese Wall

Info barrier in an organization to prevent exchanges or communications that could lead to conflicts of interest