Psychology Chapter 2 Vocab

Heuristic

mental shortcut that helps us to streamline our thinking and make sense of our world

Representativeness

heuristic that involves judging the probability of an event by its superficial similarity to a prototype

Base Rate

how common a characteristic or behavior is

Availability

heuristic that involves estimating the likelihood of an occurrence based on the ease with which it comes to our minds

Cognitive Bias

systematic error in thinking

Hindsight Bias

tendency to overestimate how well we could have successfully forecasted known outcomes

Overconfidence

tendency to overestimate our ability to make correct predictions

Naturalistic Observation

watching behavior in real-world settings

External Validity

extent to which we can generalize findings to real-world settings

Internal Validity

extent to which we can draw cause-and-effect inferences from a study

Case Study

research design that examines one person or a small number of people in depth, often over an extended time period

Existence Proof

demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur

Correlational Design

research design that examines the extent to which two variables are associated

Scatterplot

grouping of points on a two-dimensional graph in which each dot represents a single person's data

Illusory Correlation

perception of a statistical association between two variables when none exists

Experiment

research design characterized by random assignment of participants to conditions and manipulation of an independent variable

Random Assignment

randomly sorting participants into two groups

Experimental Group

in an experiment, the group of participants that receives the manipulation

Control Group

in an experiment, the group of participants that doesn't receive the manipulation

Independent Variable

treatment or intervention that the experimenter "manipulates" or varies

Dependent Variable

variable that an experimenter measures to see whether the manipulation has an effect

Operationalization

specification of how a variable is being measured for the purposes of a particular study

Reliability

consistency of measurement

Validity

extent to which a measure assesses what it claims to measure

Confounding Variable/Confound

any difference between the experimental and control groups other than the independent variable

Placebo Effect

improvement resulting from the mere expectation of improvement

Blind

unaware of whether one is in the experimental or control group

Experimenter Bias Effect

phenomenon in which researchers' hypotheses lead them to unintentionally bias the outcome of a study

Double-blind

when neither researchers nor participants are aware of who's in the experimental or control group

Demand Characteristics

cues that participants pick up from a study that allow them to generate guesses regarding the researcher's hypotheses

Random Selection

procedure that ensures every person in a population has equal chance of being selected

Response Sets

tendencies of research participants to distort their responses to questionnaire items

Informed Consent

informing research participants of what is involved in a study before asking them to participate

Statistics

application of mathematics to describing and analyzing data

Descriptive Statistics

numerical characterizations that describe data

Inferential Statistics

mathematical methods that allow us to determine whether we can generalize findings from our sample to the full population

Central Tendency

measure of the "central" scores in a data set, or where the group tends to cluster

Mean

average; a measure of central tendency

Median

middle score in a data set; a measure of central tendency

Mode

mot frequent score in a data set; a measure of central tendency

Dispersion

measure of how loosely or tightly bunched scores are

Range

difference between the highest and lowest scores; a measure of dispersion

Standard Deviation

measure of dispersion that takes into account how far each data point is from the mean

Peer Review

mechanism by which experts in a field carefully screen the work of their colleagues