four sections of article
#NAME?
what was found when the different components of CI were tested individually with child participants?
- 5 and 8 year olds were interviewed about staged event using context reinstatement (CR), change perspective (CP) and change order (CO) while control group were asked to try harder
- no significant differences in recall performance
- CI wasn't useful for
what was found when the different components of CI were tested individually against full procedure?
#NAME?
why is it necessary to test all components of CI separately?
#NAME?
can CI be compared with the Standard Interview?
- issue with validity of interview being compared as it isn't measured in the same way so the lack of consistency leads to low reliability
- with CI additional time and attention is dedicated to it
- moreover interviewers would be more motivated to perfor
can CI be compared with the Guided Memory interview (GMI)?
#NAME?
How can memory be measured?
#NAME?
quality of training
differences in attitudes, motivation and prior experience of interviewers play a big role in determining the results obtained with the CI
suggestions for training based on findings
#NAME?
conclusions of article
#NAME?
possible 15 marker topics
#NAME?
evaluation: psychology as a science
cause and effect
- IV: each component of CI tested separately
- DV: memory - amount of accurate info; issues with this because unaware of amount of potential information that needs to be recalled
- control group: use GMI and not standard interview
- extra