CHP 190 HW questions

What is true of vagueness

it occurs in varying degrees

when a claim is ambiguous due to the ambiguity of a particular word or phrase, it is referred to as having _____ ambiguity

semantic

the less detail a claim provides, the more general it is

true

please don't make any more late night phone calls. the part of this statement that is arguably vague is "anymore

false

newspaper headline "unskilled workers get shot at jobs" identify the type of ambiguity

semantic

cultural desire

personal motivation to become culturally aware by remaining open minded to learning and being accepting of others

cultural knowledge

information about cultural groups from resources such as journal articles such as journal articles, textbooks, workshops, and continuing education courses

cultural skill

ability to collect relevant information about cultural preferences in a professional manner

cultural encounters

the process of engaging with patients from culturally diverse backgrounds

cultural awareness

self examination to gain insight into their own beliefs and values

what describes the relationship between cultural competence and health disparities

1) understanding the needs of underserved patients and by identifying the unique resources available within these populations, the healthcare provider can positively impact patients healthcare experience.
2) working within the patients cultural needs and

what is true about being culturally correct

its expected to make mistakes in cross cultural encounters as long as you acknowledge and learn from them

cultural competence

1) providing interpreter services
2) recruiting and retaining professionals with minority backgrounds
3) incorporating culture specific attitudes in health promotion
4) training staff to improve cultural awareness

culture can be defined as a persons race, ethnic or national identity

false. race, ethnicity and nationality are only a part of culture, which has nothing to do with any aspect of group identity and related values, beliefs, and practices

a value judgment assess the merit, desirability, or praiseworthiness of someone or something

true

one principle of moral reasoning is that separate moral cases, if similar, must be given similar treatment

true

if someone appears to be violating the consistency principle, then the burden of proof is one that personal to show that he or she is in fact not violating the principle

true

moral relativism is a theory or framework according to which actions are right or wrong because of the beliefs of ones culture or group

true

deontologism is a moral theory or framework, especially connected with Mill, according to which actions are right or wrong because of the total happiness they bring about

false, the study of the nature of duty and obligation

in legal reasoning appeal to precedent is the practice of using a case that has already been decided as an authoritative guide in deciding a new case that is similar

true

appeal to precedent

the claim that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case that it should be settled in the same way

legal moralism

The theory that, if an activity is immoral, it should also be illegal

harm principle

The claim that the only way to justify a restriction on a person's freedom is to show that the restriction prevents harm to other people

legal paternalism

The theory that a restriction on a person's freedom can sometimes be justified by showing that it is for that person's own benefit

offense principle

The claim that an action or activity can justifiably be made illegal if it is sufficiently offensive

ethics

it can be difficult to evaluate whether two cases are the same or different

what frameworks for moral reasoning focuses mainly on ones intentions

deontology

doctors would help their terminally ill patients commit suicide by prescribing lethal doses of pain medication, this moral framework justifies this action

utilitarianism

one way to make headway in your own thinking about moral issues is to

get clear on which perspective, if any. you are assuming

which of the following perspectives has the view that the consequences of a decision, deed, or policy determine its moral value

consequentialism

which of the following focuses not on what to do but how to be

virtue ethics

which of the following moral philosophies are nonmaleficence and beneficence primarily associated with

consequentialism

which of the following descriptions fit justice as a bioethical principle

1) avoiding discrimination against patients
2) ensuring health care systems provide equal access to healthcare
3) ensuring the benefits and risks of biomedical research are shared among multiple groups

which of the following is an essential component of informed consent

1) the patient is considered competent
2) patients receive complete, truthful, and useable information
3) consent is voluntary

autonomy

state or condition of self governance or leading ones life according to reasons, values, or desires that are authentically ones own

Nonmaleficence

do no harm

beneficence

Doing good or causing good to be done; kindly action

justice

fairness; rightfulness

inconsistency ad hominem

thinking a person's inconsistencies refute his or her beliefs

straw man

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker chooses a deliberately poor or oversimplified example in order to ridicule and refute an idea.

false dilemma

A fallacy of oversimplification that offers a limited number of options (usually two) when in fact more options are available.

begging the question

A fallacy in which a claim is based on evidence or support that is in doubt.

misplaced burden of proof

the demand for evidence is placed on the wrong side of the issue

burden of proof

the obligation facing a persuasive speaker to prove that a change from current policy is necessary

hasty generalization

a fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer tries to support a general statement or rule by citing too few supporting cases

fallacy of the lonely fact

an alternative name for the fallacy of hasty generalization

population

an identifiable group of things

fallacy of a small sample

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer generalizes about a large or heterogeneous population on the basis of too small a sample.

Generalizing from Exceptional Cases

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer arrives at a general statement by citing an atypical supporting case.

Fallacy of Biased Sample

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer generalizes about a large or heterogeneous population on the basis of an atypical sample.

self selection fallacy

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer generalizes incautiously from a self-selected sample.

fallacy of accident

a fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer assumes that a general statement automatically applies to a specific case that is exceptional

weak analogy

a weak argument based on debatable or unimportant similarities between two or more things

mistaken appeal to authority

a fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer tries to support a contention by offering as evidence the opinion of a nonauthorative source

mistaken appeal to popularity

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer treats an issue that cannot be settled by public opinion as if it can.

mistaken appeal to common practice

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer tries to justify a practice on the grounds that it is traditional or is commonly practiced.

bandwagon fallacy

occurs when a speaker or writer treats an issue that cannot be settled by public opinion as if it can

post hoc ergo propter hoc

a fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer assumes that the fact that one event came after another establishes that it was caused by it

overlooking the possibly of coincidence

a fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer assumes that a coincidental temporal juxtaposition of two events is due to causation

overlooking a possible common cause

a fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer overlooks the possibility that two things may both be the effects of a third thing

overlooking the possibility of variation

a fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer assumes that random fluctuation is due to causation

Overlooking the Possibility of Regression

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer assumes that a change in the value of a variable from more atypical to less on subsequent measurements is due to causation.

Cum hoc ergo propter hoc

a fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer assumes that the fact that two events happen at about the same time establishes that one caused the other

overlooking the possibility of coincidence

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer assumes that a coincidental temporal juxtaposition of two events is due to causation.

overlooking a possible common cause

a fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer overlooks the possibility that two things may both be the effects of a third thing

Argument by Anecdote

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer tries to support a general claim by offering a story.

slippery slope

the fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer rests a conclusion on an unsupported warning that is controversial and tendentious to the effect that something will have dire consequences

untestable explanation

An induction fallacy where someone offers an explanation that could not be tested even in principle.

euphemism

a neutral or positive expression used to overcome negative associations

dysphemism

a negative expression used to tone down positive associations

weaseler

a device used to water down or weaken a claim to give the author a way out

downplayer

a device used to diminish or downgrade a person or an accomplishment

stereotype

a generalization or assumption about all members of a group

innuendo

an insinuation of something deprecatory

loaded question

a question that rests on unwarranted or unjustified assumptions

hyperbole

exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.

what is the difference between misinformation and disinformation

misinformation is unententially misleading or false, while disinformation is intentially misleading or false

algorithms help to spread or curtail mis and disinformation by prompting certain content over other content

...