How old is the earth?
Evolutionist think the earth is about 4.5 billion years old.
Where did the young earth worldview come from?
It came from the bible.
What does the young worldview say about how old the earth is?
They think the world is 6,000 years old.
The age of the earth debate ultimately comes down to two important questions...
Are we trusting man's imperfect nature and changing ideas and assumptions about the past? Or are we gonna trustGod's perfectly accurate eyewitness account of the past, including the creation of the world, Noah's global flood, and the age of the earth?
Dating the age of the earth..
All uniformitarian dating methods require assumptions for extrapolating present-day processes back into the past.
What does our belief come down to?
Radiometric dating is the thing that leads us to believe that the earth is millions or billions years old.
The assumptions related to radiometric dating can be seen in these questions..
�Initial amounts?
�Was any parent amount added?
�Was any daughter amount added?
�Was any parent amount removed?
�Was any daughter amount removed?
�Has the rate of decay changed?
Radiometric dates often disagree?
If the assumptions were true then the uniformitarian dates should agree with the radiometric dates.
Billions of years?
There is proof that no way the earth could be 4.5 billion years old estimated by Radiometric dating.
God's view, and evolutionist view...
If we look in God's word, we see that the earth isn't that old but if we look through evolutionist perspective it doesn't add up to what the bible says and how the earth is not billions of years old.
Proof the bible is right..
In different cultures around the world they give an age of the earth that points that the bible is true.
What's your belief?
It depends on what you believe on how old the earth is, you have to choose between world views.
What if Radiometric dating fails?
If it fails to give an accurate date on something that we know is true then how can it be trusted to give us the correct age for rocks had no recorders? Then if the methods don't work on things we already know, how can we trust it when we don't know the a
Radiometric dating unreliable?
Evolutionist say that radiometric dating is unreliable and can't be trusted.
Historians should not be ignored...
Their dates of thousands of years are good support for the biblical date of about 6,000 years, and not for billions of years.
Two sides but one that is true...
�evolutionist perspective
� biblical perspective
They both want to prove different things but the biblical perspective proves what the evolutionist don't know.
Recap:Evolutionist perspective
They think that Adam never existed, the bible isn't true and that the earth is billions of years old.
Recap: Biblical perspective
They believe that the bible is true, God does exist and that there was no way that the earth is billions of years old.
What's your worldview?
Its now our turn to choose which side we believe in, which one do we think is right? And which one di we think is wrong?