Richard III Critics

Tillyard

'Shakespeare accepted the prevalent belief that God had guided England into her haven of Tudor prosperity'

Kott

'for Shakespeare, history stands still'

Moseley on Richard's victims

None of Richard's victims are gutless of innocent blood

Young on women

Women have power in the play because they seem to be beyond Richards control

Prescott on Hastings

a figure of colossal complacency

Rich

Richard is a chameleon

Connolly

part of a wider narrative of divine retribution

Dollimoore on women

unusual...in the prominence of its female character

Galloway on women

[the women] mitigate the natural destructiveness inherent in a male dominated world

Kott on Margaret

[Shakespeare] has revivified her

In the Michael Boyd production, Margaret

literally carried the past with her (in the form of the skeleton of her son)

Kott on Richmond

Necessary but personally uninteresting

Hebron on the Tudor Myth interpretation

Tudor triumphalism... is remarkably muted

Barker and Murray on disability

metaphorical shortcut to ideas of deviance

Greenblat on disability

he has internalised the loathing he inspires

Donkor on disability

parroting ugly and abusive taunts

Schaap Williams: 'body anomalies were seen as...

...evidence of deeper moral truths'

Schaap Williams: 'the body...

...enables his actions'

Greenblat on Anne

shallow, corruptible, naively ambitious, and, above all, frightened

Greenblat on women

keep moral hope alive for us

Greenblat on Margaret

haunts the royal court like a half-crazed Greek tragic chorus

Hebron on women

reminders of the past which suggest that a cosmic force is at work

Belsey on Elizabeth

a kind of ventriloquist dummy

Belsey on women

Richard appropriates the theatrical power and agency of the women

Tillyard on women

a chorus to lament and observes but powerless to influence events

Tillyard: 'women's lamentations were...

...ritual, incantory, and ecclesiastical in tone'

Dash on women

Margaret empowers the other women to stand up to Richard

Dusinberre

Shakespeare challenged an Elizabethan view of gender

Rackin on women

women are marginalised

Bushnell: 'Richard becomes...

...both the man who possesses and the woman who submits'

Greenblat on Richard as the Vice

a wickedly engaging ability to defer though not finally to escape well-deserved punishment

Hebron on the Vice

Shakespeare adds layers which take him away from the medieval tradition

Holland on McKellan's Richard

his most natural ally is the camera

Donkor on Machiavelli

Richard's actions disfigure Machiavellian ideas

Donkor: 'Richard's barbarism...

...is gratuitous'

Donkor: 'Richard's anti-Machiavellian...

...wavering between roles and modes of conduct'

Greenblat: 'Richard thrives...

...on the violation of social and natural bonds''

Maniutiu

Richard III means nothing without love

In Maniutiu's production the exchanges between Richard and Margaret become...

raunchy flirtation driven by mutual sexual fascination

Greenblat: 'Tudor apologists depict Richard as...

... a monster of evil'

Kott: 'the plays was rehearsing...

...repressed anxieties about the Elizabethan succession'

Hebron on free will

decision-making is an illusion disguising a scripted reality