Health Law

Precedence

The law that came before in other trials; the guidance that came before from other rulings; Common law Principle/black letter law

Res Judicata

its decided; Common Law Principle/black letter law

Stare decisis

Let the decision stand; Common Law Principle; black letter law

Cross v. Guthery (1794)

First Medical Malpractice Case Breast/Bled to death/Damages

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Judicial Power example; people are the same no matter where in history: last day of office President John Adams the federalist congress/party decided he was going to give his friends new jobs appointed 16 circuit judges and 42 justices of the peace Judici

3 Branches of Government

Legislative, Executive and Judicial

Separation of powers

Checks and balances

Department of Health and Human Services and it's Center for Medicare and Medicaid

how each program came into being during Presidency of Lyndon Johnson in 1965 and explained the basics of Part A,B,C, D to help finance insurance chiefly age 65 and over.

Statutory Law ( Legislature)

comes out of the legislature at the federal level in congress; or from the senate house; and each bicameral (two Bodies) body has a senate and a house representative. The law that is made in the legislature (made by Congress) Nebraska does not use bicamer

March 7

Florida's Legislative session begins and typically files more that 2000 bills with possibly passing 200+ meet for 2 months. only have to do florida constitutioally is pass the budget.

Administrative law (Executive)

comes out of the agencies out of the executive branch as rules and regulations; rules and regs that come from administrative agencies from the executive powers.

Judicial decisions (court cases)

come from court cases interpreted by Judicial rulings guided by precedence

Strict Liability

when an activity regardless of fault, intentions or negligence is so dangerous to others that public policy demands absolute responsibility on the part of the wrongdoer

Medical Malpractice

a negligence concept

IRAC

Legal thinking;
Issue-Reasoning- Analysis-Conclusion

Eggshell Skull Rule

Take them as they come; Early battery case in Vosburg; to take plaintiff as you find them; intentional tort case in Garratt to illustrate a minor can be liable for intentional tort with force; and the duty of care inly goes so far as is reasonabley forsee

civil cases

mediated with money

Injunctions

making someone stop action

criminal cases

resolved by jail time

Tort (civil)

to harm; to prove there was culpability for wrongdoing
1-preservation of peace
2-Culpability
3-deterrance and
4-compensation remedy the harm damages through fines typically $ or stop action. We do not use the word guilty compensate with money in a civil m

3 categories of tort (civil)

1-negligence
2- intentional torts
3- strict liability

RPP threshhold

what a Reasonable Prudent Person would do (Peer against Peer)

Negligence

to do or not todo something that a reasonable prudent person would or would not do under given circumstance; civil or personal wrong

3 basic forms of negligence:

1- Malfeasance-performace of unlawful/improper act
2-Misfeasance improper performace resulting in injury
3-Nonfeasance-failure to act when there is duty to act RPP Threshold

Intentional tort

assult and battery; false imprisonment; and invasion of privacy; defamation of character in libel and slander cases; and intentional infliction of mental distress

Kowal v Deer Park Fire District

shows professionals are held to higher standard when an EMS guy stuck a tube in the wrong place for intubation.

Elements of Negligence

1-duty to care
2- Breach of Duty
3- Injury
4- Causation
a. forseeability
b. test for foreseeability;

4 elements of tort
[to win/settle claim]

1- duty to use due care (national)
2- breach of duty
3- causation/injury/actual harm
(proximate or legal cause)
4-that results in damage typically remediated by $ or other equitable solutions.
Presumably this harm was forseeable and therefore preventable.

8 categories of claims typically face providers

1-Professional negligence
2- Vicarious liability Ostensible Agency
3- Corporate liability
4- Informed Consent
5- Negligenct Infliction of Emotional DIstress
6- EMTALA
7- Wrongful life/wrong birth
8- Negligent Disclosure of Medical Records

Professional Liability posed as direct liability

whether in negligent hiring/retention; vicarious liability; apparent agency; and various iterations on the legal doctrine that holds employers liable in certain cases for the wrongful acts of their agents

Medical Malpractice case structure

...

Pleadings

include papers such as complaint, demurrer, answer, and bill of particulars.

Res Ipsa loquitur

the thing speaks for itself
circumstances speak for themselves
Shifts burden of proof in negligence case from plaintiff to defendant

Capping non income damaged

2014 Supreme Court Ruling in McCall tha Overturned those caps beg a thin going to legislature to ask for more funds; to have contract honored;

Medical Malpractice insurance

cyclical nature of insurance market

3 components of insurance

1- id of covered risk
2- specifications of amt payable
3- specificatioin of occurance

Insurance

contract in which company agrees to assume risk of insured party for payment of premium.

three primary categories of risk

1-property loss
2- personal
3- legal liability

Occurrence policies

cover all policies during the policy year, regardless of when they are reported

claims made policies

cover claims made or reported during the policy year, no matter when they occurred.

standard liabilities policies have five distinct parts

1- Insurance agreement
2- Defense and settlement
3- Policy Period
4- Amount by insurance company
5- Policy Conditions

Plaintiff V. Defendant

plaintiff files the complaint

Pleading

Alligation

Responds

Admit or deny

Bill of Particulars

Details of claims

Discovery

Digging out the evidence

Demurrer Objection

complaint is insufficient; is an objection to lawsuit

Depositions

testimony of what happened

Priveledge of Attorney/Client

Confidentiality under the law

Civil law burden of Proof:
Proponderance of the evidence

is a far less difficult threshold to meet than what would be required in a criminal case.
In civil case means you are more persuasive than not to the JURY. 50 % more persuasive than not.
Burden in criminal is beyond resonable doubt; can go to jail.
Hiring

Criminal Threshhold

Beyond reasonable doubt; prove all 3 elements beyond a reasonable doubt

criminal law

limits behavior that alls out outside of social norms and social harms are then punishable though incarceration et...

Model penal code

the concept of guilt in criminal law

3 elements of a crime

1- ACTUS RETUS- the guilty act that rises to the level of a crime
2-MENS REA- requisite mental state/intent mental state to commit a criminal act
3-circumstances that proved it was acted upon

Majority health law cases

deal with some type of health fraud

Department of Justice, Office of IG, and other federal prosecutors

recover health fraud dollars chiefly through violations of FALSE CLAIMS ACT, STARK VIOLATIONS, and the ANTIKICKBACK statues.

False Claims Act of 1986

Violation of the act happen whenever a provider knowingly presents to government a false claim for payment

Corporate Integrity Agreement

5 year written agreement on how a health systems thought to be too big to punish without harming the people they serve settle alligations with office of Inspector general.

Federal Stark Law

federal law that prohibits self referral specifically from referring Medicare/Medicaid patients designated health services to entities which the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship unless an exemption applies.

Florida Patient Self Referring Act of 1992

florida state provisions 42 CFR 411.350-389 tougher than federal law

Stark

named after former Congressman Peter Stark of California;
strict liability civil statue you can violate without realizing. The ACA now self disclosure protocols to assist to help lower your penalties.

3 priority items in Stark to consider in your transactions with physicians

1-Fair Market Value
2- Commercially Reasonable
3-Compensation cannot take into account volume or Value of the refferals between parties

Stark purpose

keep physicians from making medical decisions influenced by financial considerations

Federal Anti-KickBack Statue (AKS)

prohibits offering, paying, soliciting or recieveing anything of value to induce or reward referrals or generate Federal health care program business

President Harry S Trumen

First to register in Medicare

Antikickback

a. statutory criminal when there is knowingly solicited or pay anything of value for referals
b. criminal negligence- negligence on steroids total disregard of sick
c. Criminal intent voluntary safe harbors
d. target a group of people to provide service t

stark violations

oftern travels with criminal violations but is technically a civil violation, it is a strict liability statue; you don't even know that you have violated it; it involves physician self referral

Qui Tam Process

Ex rel/whistleblower relator brings attention to government of fradulent claim

1-Original source

who has direct and independent knowledge of wrongdoing

2-unclean hands

does not have uncleand hands/has not participated in the wrongdoing

Seal

complaint remains secret while the action remains under investigation of about 60 days or extended

Ex Rel Plaintiff v. D

If DOJ takes over case then it becomes public

Ex Rel Compensation %

15-25 % of recovery
30% of the government doesn't intervene

Elin Baklid v. Halifax

stark paper violation Oncology M.D.

Dr. Drakeford v Tuomey Healthcare sysytems Inc. C coro

19 doctors had to use hospital for 10 years, very long contract for part time services with no information on what to practice

ex ral shawn helen v Wellcare Humana etc.

tampa and hawaii

Florida Toucher Statues

1- The FLorida Patient Bokering Act
2- The Florida AntiKickback Statue
3- The Medicaid antikickback statue

Contracts

Some enforceable some are not

Agreement 3 elements

1-offer(to do something or not to do something)
2- Consideration (something of value, promised in exchange) for which, there was mutual acceptance
3- Acceptance (there was a meeting of the minds as to what was agreed upon)

If breached

can be argued in a court of law if a lawsuit if filed in a contract dispute

chartering a corporation

sunbiz.org
articles of incorporation
corporations internal bylaws
then apply for EIN number IRS

8 Potential choices of legal entity

1-P.A.
2-C Corp
3- LLC

choice of legal entity/structuring

based on counsel of legal and accounting tax advisors.
they help decide what level of liability protection and tax advantages will be best for operation

P.A. Professional Association

all shareholders are the same kind of licensed professionals in a PA.

C-Corp

C Corporation Inc.

LLC

Limited Liability Corporation

For Profit corporation

Investor Owned/with at least one director; asset ownership

Non profit corporation

at least 3 member board directors; tax exemptions; 501c 3 status with IRS

Bad Debt

Write off bad debt as a reduction in revenue and not as an expense

Operating Margin

operating revenue - operating expenses = operating margin

Not for Profit

Margin re invested in within organization

Acquisition of non-profit by a for profit system

Prf Goodman wrote law review article Cy Press judicial process

employement contracts

include key provisions on duties, base compensation, termination, regulatory matters, medical staff membership, conflicts of interest, base salary adjustments through RVU's

New Payment Model/

New physician payment model that pays more on quality/value outcomes, ACO's, medical homes and bundle payments

MACRA

Medicare Access and Chip Reauthorization Act - a law that alters how doctors are paid.

Restrictive Covenants (non-compete)

clause in an employement contract that is typically enforceable if they are narrowly tailored to geographic and time length limits .

Dr. Eskioglu

Lee county neurosurgeoun

settlements

contract agreements there is no liability or guilt fr previously alleged wrongdoing that is now settled.

Contingency fee contract agreement

trial lawyers can enter into contracts with clients that may promise them 30-40% of an award if recovery is achieved.

Contigency arrangements

used in civil negligence and malpractice lawsuits, were challenged when a local law firm won a recvery from Lee Memorial on behalf of a child injured at birth; award was capped by sovereign immunity $200,000.

Claims bill process

beg-a-thon -law firm pursues additional remedies from legislature; award was increased byt legislature capped out law firms fees. Lawyers challenged and went to florida supreme court and prevailed on theory that legislature cannot disrupt contract agreeme

Medical Staff Bylaws

Function as if they were a contract

Bad debt needs to be booked

subtract from the revenue

Anti Trust:
Sherman Anti-Trust Act Key Federal Law

section 1: prohibits concerted actions which unreasonable restrain competition
section 2: generally prohibits monopolies

Sherman Act 3 things they look at:

1-did competitors (2 or more) get together and agree to charge a particular amount for a particular service (PRICE FIXING)
2-did the two independent competitors come together and decide to not contract with an HMO (BOYCOTTING)
3-did they independently get

Anti trust law violations

FTC and department of justice will pursue them all

MCO MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATIONS

Fee for service; alter patient doctor contract for fee for service

Gatekeeper

...

ACO

discounted fee; reduce cost, yet preserve quality, and if these value based outcomes are achieved

Utilization Review (UR)

can shift the risk

Canterbury v Spence

informed consent; all risk; professional liability Threshold is PRR

HMO Health Maintenance Organization
(PPO,POS, EPO)

medical necessity

ERISA

federal law; protection against pension and health plans only in private industry

SB 240

Direct Primary Care

SB262

amend the HMO act to provide civil causes of actions against HMO

Wickline v state of California

Utilization Reviewer (UR) demonstrated potential liability for clinical role

Rush Prudential HMO, Inc v. Moran

Moran; HMO are risk bearing organizations subject to state insurance regulation "the Illinois HMO act" is thus saved from pre emption under ERISA's saving clause

Borinquen and HCD model

good infrastructure safety net for primary care project in underserved areas

Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs)

work by circulating in NC and PBC DOH was ordered to get out of primary care business.