researchmeth


Experiment


one manipulated variable - IVone labile measured variable-DV


Correlational Study


two measured variablesone called predictor (cause)one called predicted (effect)


Quasi-Experiment


one stable measured variable (SV) treated as the IVone labile measured variable treated as DV


"Third Variable"


a (typically unmeasured) variable that could be the cause of both the measured variables in a correlational studyTo fix, identifiy, measure, and co vary it out


Spurious


a significant relationship that is not causal (in either direction)


Cross-lagged


the correlation between one variable at one time and another variable at another time used to determine the more likely direction of causationif r2 X1Y2 > X2Y1 then X is probably the cause


Partial (With respect to Z)


the correlation between two variables after the effects of a third variable (Z) have been removed used to test (and rule out) a third variable explanation if prXY.Z=rXY then Z is not a cause of both X and Y


External Validity


the extent to which the results (from an experiment) will generalize to other situations


Context Specificity


when the results from an experiment or study are unique to the situation


Person Specificity


when the results from an experiment or study are unique to the subjects


Convenience Sampling


when only easily-recruited subjects are used


Simple Random Sampling


when all members of the population have a definable probability of being sampled, but no attempt is made to match the group sizes


Proportional Stratified Random Sampling


when the relative sizes of the groups in the sample are forced to be the same as those in the population


Quota Sampling


Most popular type of non-proportional stratified random samplingwhen the sizes of the groups in the sample are forced to be equal


Survey or Questionnaire


a structured set of items designed to measure attitudes, beliefs, values, or behavioral tendencies


Scale


a small set of items designed to measure a particular attitude, belief, value, or behavioral tendencyLikert: sets of strongly agree thru strongly disagree itemsGuttman: sets of ascending questionsThurstone: check all that apply (that are worth varying points)Semantic Differential: indicate position between opposite pairs


Naturalistic Observation


studying behavior in everyday environments without getting involvedkey threat: reactivity (secondary observer bias)


Participant Observation


studying behavior from within the target group key threat: standard experimenter bias (secondary observer bias) note: Participant observation is not often possible since no consent observation can only occur when and where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy


Observer Bias


when the beliefs or expectancies of the observers influence what is recordedinter-coder reliability must be at least .90


Experimenter Bias


in general, when the beliefs and or expectancies of the experimenter end up altering the resultsstandard experimenter bias: occurs when the experimenter behaves differently when collecting data in different conditions (experimenter reactivity)defenses: remove experimenter or double-blindobserver bias is when only the recording of data is altered by the beliefs of the observerdefenses: checklists and or partial sampling


Ex-post-facto Quasi Experiment


when you take only one sample and then divide the subjects into the groups after-the-fact


Planned Quasi-Experiment


when you take separate samples for each of the groupsnote: this is another good example of the effort vs quality trade-off


Longitudinal Study


(aging) when you follow the same subjects over timemajor unique threat is time-frame (zeitgeist) effects


Cross-Sectional Study


(aging) when you take separate samples for each age group (at the same time)major unique threat is cohort effects
Solution to both longitudinal and cross sectional: run a hybrid study and verify same results either way


Decision Tree


Domain: are you studying hidden, internal variables or behavior? This determines whether to use a survey or observationSampling: how much does this depend on who is measured? determines whether some fancy method (stratified, proportional, random) must be usedCausal Logic: is one of my variables either highly stable or the passage of time? determines whether one of the specific designs is used


Directionality Problem


it could be that X causes Y or that Y causes X to determine, run a cross-lagged study