PHIL 102 Exam 3 Formal Logic

Modus Ponens (MP)

If A the B
A
Therefore B

Hypothetical Syllogism (HS)

If A then B
If B then C
Therefore, if A then C

Modus Tollens (MT)

If A then B
Not B
Therefore, not A

Disjunctive Syllogism (DS) / Modus Tollendo Ponens (MTP)

Either A or B
Not A
Therefore, B

The Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent

Invalid of Modus Ponens (MP)
If A then B
B
Therefore A

The Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent

Invalid Modus Tollens (MT)
If A then B
Not A
Therefore, not B

Invalid Disjunctive Syllogism/Modus Tollendo Ponens

Either A or B
A
Therefore, not B

Invalid Hypothetical Syllogism (HS)

If A then B
If C then B
If A then C

Division

The Fallacy of Division consists of arguing that what is true about a whole (or a collection) is necessarily true about each part of that whole (or each element or subgroup of that collection)

Composition

The Fallacy of Composition consists in arguing that what is true about each part of a given whole (or each element or subgroup of that collection) is necessarily true about the whole (or that collection)

Enthymeme

An abbreviated argument or argument form in which at least one premise is suppressed. Revealing the suppressed premise will make the argument valid in form.
Ex: All Humans are mortal
Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
All Humans are mortal
Socrates is human
T

Accident

The fallacy of accident consists of applying a general rule to a specific case whose unique circumstances make the application of the rule inappropriate. We should never apply rules in a mechanical fashion, because rules are presumptive generalizations wh

Converse accident / Hasty Generalization

The fallacy of converse accident consists in deriving a general rule from specific cases whose unique circumstances make the derivation inappropriate. We should never generalize from unusual, atypical, or unrepresentative cases, because rules are presumpt